0.04/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 07:37:09 EDT 2024
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.20/0.50	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iAPyOjZy7r/E---3.1_10352.p
0.20/0.51	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.20/0.51	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHN.
0.20/0.51	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.20/0.51	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 900s (5) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting sh2 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting sh3 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# pre_casc_2 with pid 10447 completed with status 0
0.20/0.51	# Result found by pre_casc_2
0.20/0.51	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHN.
0.20/0.51	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.20/0.51	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 900s (5) cores
0.20/0.51	# No SInE strategy applied
0.20/0.51	# Search class: HUUPM-FFSF32-DHHSFMNN
0.20/0.51	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.20/0.51	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 541s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting sh2 with 91s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting sh3 with 91s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting sh9 with 91s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10 with 86s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# sh2 with pid 10454 completed with status 0
0.20/0.51	# Result found by sh2
0.20/0.51	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHN.
0.20/0.51	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.20/0.51	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 900s (5) cores
0.20/0.51	# No SInE strategy applied
0.20/0.51	# Search class: HUUPM-FFSF32-DHHSFMNN
0.20/0.51	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.20/0.51	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 541s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Starting sh2 with 91s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.51	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.20/0.51	
0.20/0.51	# Proof found!
0.20/0.51	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.51	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.51	thf(decl_32, type, ten: ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
0.20/0.51	thf(decl_35, type, mult: (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > (($i > $i) > $i > $i) > ($i > $i) > $i > $i).
0.20/0.51	thf(decl_36, type, esk1_1: $i > $i).
0.20/0.51	thf(decl_37, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.20/0.51	thf(thm, conjecture, ((mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ (mult @ ten @ ten))=(mult @ (mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ ten) @ ten)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iAPyOjZy7r/E---3.1_10352.p', thm)).
0.20/0.51	thf(mult_ax, axiom, ((mult)=(^[X4:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X1:$i > $i, X2:$i]:(X4 @ (X3 @ X1) @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iAPyOjZy7r/E---3.1_10352.p', mult_ax)).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ((mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ (mult @ ten @ ten))!=(mult @ (mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ ten) @ ten)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm])])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ (mult @ ten @ ten))!=(mult @ (mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ ten) @ ten)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X34:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X35:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X36:$i > $i, X37:$i]:(((mult @ X34 @ X35 @ X36 @ X37)=(X34 @ (X35 @ X36) @ X37))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mult_ax])])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ((mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ (mult @ ten @ ten))!=(mult @ (mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ ten) @ ten)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X67:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X68:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X69:$i > $i, X70:$i]:(((mult @ X67 @ X68 @ X69 @ X70)=(X67 @ (X68 @ X69) @ X70))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((mult @ (mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ ten) @ ten @ esk1_1 @ esk2_0)!=(mult @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ (mult @ ten @ ten) @ esk1_1 @ esk2_0)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:$i > $i, X4:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X2:$i]:(((mult @ X3 @ X4 @ X1 @ X2)=(X3 @ (X4 @ X1) @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((ten @ (ten @ (mult @ ten @ ten @ esk1_1)) @ esk2_0)!=(ten @ (ten @ (ten @ (ten @ esk1_1))) @ esk2_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_8]), c_0_8]), c_0_8]), c_0_8])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((mult @ ten @ ten @ esk1_1)!=(ten @ (ten @ esk1_1))), inference(ext_eqres,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.20/0.51	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]), c_0_8])]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.51	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.51	# Parsed axioms                        : 29
0.20/0.51	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.20/0.51	# Initial clauses                      : 29
0.20/0.51	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
0.20/0.51	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
0.20/0.51	# Processed clauses                    : 36
0.20/0.51	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.20/0.51	# ...subsumed                          : 2
0.20/0.51	# ...remaining for further processing  : 34
0.20/0.51	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.51	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.51	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/0.51	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.20/0.51	# Generated clauses                    : 55
0.20/0.51	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 55
0.20/0.51	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.51	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.51	# Paramodulations                      : 41
0.20/0.51	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.51	# NegExts                              : 7
0.20/0.51	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/0.51	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.20/0.51	# Total rewrite steps                  : 87
0.20/0.51	# ...of those cached                   : 61
0.20/0.51	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.51	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.51	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.51	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.51	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.51	# Current number of processed clauses  : 16
0.20/0.51	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
0.20/0.51	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
0.20/0.51	#    Negative unit clauses             : 8
0.20/0.51	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.20/0.51	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 49
0.20/0.51	# ...number of literals in the above   : 49
0.20/0.51	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.51	# Current number of archived clauses   : 18
0.20/0.51	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.20/0.51	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.20/0.51	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.20/0.51	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
0.20/0.51	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.51	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 320
0.20/0.51	# BW rewrite match successes           : 6
0.20/0.51	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.20/0.51	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.51	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2400
0.20/0.51	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 78
0.20/0.51	
0.20/0.51	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.51	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.20/0.51	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.20/0.51	# Total time               : 0.009 s
0.20/0.51	# Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
0.20/0.51	
0.20/0.51	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.51	# User time                : 0.018 s
0.20/0.51	# System time              : 0.011 s
0.20/0.51	# Total time               : 0.028 s
0.20/0.51	# Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
0.20/0.51	% E---3.1 exiting
0.20/0.52	% E exiting
0.20/0.52	EOF